CAN WE CALL IT FREEDOM?

Note: This was published in October 2020. Since its a contemporary subject just publishing it again.

The  photograph appeared in today's news paper (Nov 2023) prompted me to write this, and being posted again. Film actress Kangana Ranaut walking through the public place surrounded by Y plus security personnel. Y category is a type of security consisting of 11 persons including one or two commandos or police personnel. Why this security is needed for Kangana, an ordinary woman, to walk through a public place in India? Because she has expressed her opinion in public about the government. She too must have voted for electing the government. Article 19  of the Indian constitution is guarenteeing individual rights and absolute freedom of expression under any circumstances for every citizen of India. Decades after approving the constitution and making it bound to be obeyed by every citizen of India, a state government is unanimously disallowing this constitutional right of a citizen in public. Is this punishable? If yes, who will take the initiative?

I do not know Kangana more than that she is a film personality. I may not support the views and opinions of the lady. I would like to ask only one question. Why the right to express within the purview of the constitution is negated to someone?

The question arises here is, whom will you ask. In a democratic nation, the Government is: "Of the People, By the People and For the People". While one may be able to manage to adjust the first two, the third does not fit in our country. It is not pertaining to any political party but it is about the system. This failed system may either replaced with a suitable one or go for a total overhaul.
.

KV George
kvgeorgein@gmail.com

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

POVERTY LEVEL OF INDIA - A COMPARISON BETWEEN INDIAN REPORT AND UNDP REPORT

ESTIMATED PRICES OF SELECTED ITEMS IN THE YEAR 2100

ENVIABLE COUNTRIES IN THE WORLD